Jan 18, 2016 the final refs are @Help like i said on my first thread i wont split the money.. one prize.. $100 each month to the highest poster
Jan 18, 2016 i hope immy or whoever else win for their one/two word spamming, i do, but this is just funny to me
Jan 18, 2016 its fine lol im not about to have an Akio meltdown talking about "after all i did for this forum"
Jan 18, 2016 Whoaaa i refreshed the page and the site evolved looks dope af. Highest poster would be narsh this month tho. Which was my point...you wouldnt need a judge if you just simplified it. Would make it less "controversial" you wouldnt even need to make threads like these. Just my two cents, maybe something to consider Its ur $100 dollars tho lol
Jan 18, 2016 after the 30 days are over...me @Mike Tyson and @Slyk will decide if the winner deserves it or not...what will be the criteria?...general spamming is fine..we encourage casual chatting in here..forums evolved a lot since 2008, however saying "hi" in chat threads isnt like saying "hi" in kendrick lamar new single thread...if the winner had 50% of his posts as "lol"..then the second choice will win...as an example and benchmarking..we do not consider @Narsh a spammer..and he would win if he was #1 .me @Mike Tyson and @Slyk will decide if the winner deserves it or not
Jan 18, 2016 if we go by those rules btw, flacko and immy should be eliminated. but im sleep like i said, i dont care u should probably lock this thread
Jan 18, 2016 The contest is who can post the most in a month...of course he's going to post more. Isn't that the whole point? I didn't notice any difference with how narsh posted so I don't think that's fair honestly. But as you said, it's your money, so I'll respect whatever decision you make.
Jan 18, 2016 no not just to post more, and no he didnt always repost 4 times in a row every day..thats silly like i said 1850 posts avg a month...to 3000 posts in 18 days...and im fine if not many of them were reposts
