Jan 4, 2016

Ha h--- ya I remember those.

 

Jan 4, 2016

@J WALK
Don't condescend me. While vaping may have been your personal solution to cigarette addiction, many people still vape for reasons other than addiction treatment. Vaping wasn't invented solely to treat nicotine addiction (this is obvious). Its purpose is to provide consumers with an alternative to cigarettes, while still giving them the nicotine buzz. The flavoring and various mods, having fun with vapor clouds, and all the other weak s--- is secondary. The vaping industry is not lucrative enough or large enough to actually threaten the entire tobacco industry.

 

Jan 4, 2016

s--- is fun af to have big smoke seshes with, we would get bored and try to see who can inhale the whole bag with the least amount of breaths lol. I got the record with 2 and im proud as s--- lmao

 

Jan 4, 2016

Not the entire yet. But vaping is a huge threat. The FDA wants it gone and control over it. I do see what your saying but your attitude towards it is wrong and some of your facts and what you see ecspically on the Internet are wrong.
I say if it helps a person or the person likes it let them have it. We have freedom of choice. I don't advocate vaping if your not addicted to nicotine already. Vape juice is also made in 0mg for people trying to quit nicotine altogether.

 

Jan 4, 2016

s--- now we got dabs

 

Jan 4, 2016

dabs too strong too fast for me, I like to rip multiple bowls throught a day and one dab just kills me lol

 

Jan 4, 2016

Personally, I am not inherently against vaping. I think the FDA wants it gone and control over it because it will emerge as a competing industry eventually, so they want to regulate the entire market and production of it. The government always seeks to control which chemicals enter the human biological system, especially if said chemicals begin to emerge as a commodity. Everyone knows that vaping, in terms of nicotine consumption and all that s---, is far superior to cigarettes because it substantially reduces the risk of cancer and other harmful side effects - it only makes sense that vaping will dominate in the coming years. Why i see this as problematic is because I think nicotine, as a staple chemical in this society, should be removed and replaced with a chemical like cannabis. Certain chemicals promote specific behaviors and encourage and even chemically yield boundary dissolution. I think its important to recognize this. One can easily identify why our society celebrates alcohol, caffeine, and nicotine while marginalizing and banning boundary diluting substances like cannabis, psilocybin mushrooms, lsd, etc. We are witnessing the attempt to mediate and limit human consciousness, of literal human biochemistry. Think about all the millions of people who will never eat mushrooms simply because of social stigma, irrational fear based on propaganda, etc. Or all the people who will never experience a cannabis high for no real legitimate reason other than personal and implicit biases. These same people will treat alcohol, caffeine, and nicotine consumption as completely normal. This is very interesting and raises very important questions. Vaping is cool to some people, but I feel that its really just a better way of consuming a mediocre extremely addictive surface level chemical. I feel, that as a society, we should move towards the traditional psychedelic substances of our ancestors, rather than consume synthetically processed industry standard, commercially produced, FDA approved, federally legal highs prescribed to the population by propaganda, manufactured trends, massive corporations, and dated power structures.