Tech The FBI Just Won: Successfully Hacked iPhone

Started by Slyk, Mar 28, 2016, in Entertainment Add to Reading List

  1. Slyk
    Posts: 8,532
    Likes: 29,700
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011
    Location: Detroit -> Cali

    Slyk God made a prophet.

    Mar 28, 2016
    sounds like it's unknown how they did it, but they've dropped the suit against Apple and have claimed success in getting into the San Bernardino iPhone.

    ...not sure what this means for privacy/security, knowing that they succeeded in creating their own backdoor.
     
    #1
    1
    Deadpool likes this.
    1
    Deadpool likes this.
    Apr 25, 2024
  2. Nick
    Posts: 7,434
    Likes: 9,377
    Joined: Mar 21, 2015

    Nick (;

    Mar 28, 2016
    Apple will come back with something that's even harder to crack
     
    #2
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  3. Trackz
    Posts: 9,457
    Likes: 16,641
    Joined: Mar 17, 2011

    Trackz BARCODE

    Mar 28, 2016
    The FBI claimed success? Kind of f----- up to boast about it.
     
    #3
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  4. Charlie Work
    Posts: 14,879
    Likes: 25,809
    Joined: Nov 28, 2014

    Charlie Work Level 5 Goblin

    Mar 28, 2016
    The FBI got help from a third party. The fact that some group already had the exploit before the FBI is hilarious. What matters is that this controversy set the tone when it comes to privacy. I expect a lot more encryption conscious products to come in the future.
     
    #4
    1
    Slyk likes this.
    1
    Slyk likes this.
    Apr 25, 2024
  5. Worm
    Posts: 15,030
    Likes: 59,580
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011
    Location: New Jersey

    Worm Big Perm Big Worm

    Mar 28, 2016
    lol they didn't really win...they knew how to do it

     
    #5
    2
    Music and Bojack like this.
    2
    Music and Bojack like this.
    Apr 25, 2024
  6. Slyk
    Posts: 8,532
    Likes: 29,700
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011
    Location: Detroit -> Cali

    Slyk God made a prophet.

    Mar 28, 2016
    pretty sure that the "dissembler" that this guy references wouldn't give back human-readible information... and that it's encrypted.
    if it were truly that easy, then the FBI wouldn't have had to go to a 3rd party to accomplish the hack.
     
    #6
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  7. Charlie Work
    Posts: 14,879
    Likes: 25,809
    Joined: Nov 28, 2014

    Charlie Work Level 5 Goblin

    Mar 28, 2016
    I've done a little more reading, and there is speculation that this was purely to set a precedent and that the NSA probably already knew how to do this.
     
    #7
    1
    Worm likes this.
    1
    Worm likes this.
    Apr 25, 2024
  8. Slyk
    Posts: 8,532
    Likes: 29,700
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011
    Location: Detroit -> Cali

    Slyk God made a prophet.

    Mar 28, 2016
    also, wondering that even if the dissembler could provide non-encrypted human-readable data, then if it would be guaranteed for the security code would still even be stored on the ram at this point, or if that gets wiped upon unlocking, or after usage? essentially he's saying that because the pin was previously entered, it would be stored in easy-readable format in the ram (memory) itself an could be read.

    i duno if that's true.
     
    #8
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  9. Slyk
    Posts: 8,532
    Likes: 29,700
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011
    Location: Detroit -> Cali

    Slyk God made a prophet.

    Mar 28, 2016
    again, why would they go through a 3rd party if this was just a ruse to try to make access even easier?
     
    #9
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  10. Charlie Work
    Posts: 14,879
    Likes: 25,809
    Joined: Nov 28, 2014

    Charlie Work Level 5 Goblin

    Mar 28, 2016
    Because there was a huge backlash? This 3rd party definitely came forward earlier than right before court proceedings begin. That's a tactical withdraw.
     
    #10
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  11. Slyk
    Posts: 8,532
    Likes: 29,700
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011
    Location: Detroit -> Cali

    Slyk God made a prophet.

    Mar 28, 2016
    Naw I get that they were trying to play apple. But what I'm saying is that if the NSA already knew how to do it, and it is so easy to do, then why did the FBI need to use a non-government 3rd party to hack the device?
     
    #11
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  12. Charlie Work
    Posts: 14,879
    Likes: 25,809
    Joined: Nov 28, 2014

    Charlie Work Level 5 Goblin

    Mar 28, 2016
    Third party is vague. I don't they specify anywhere that it wasn't a government entity.
     
    #12
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  13. Slyk
    Posts: 8,532
    Likes: 29,700
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011
    Location: Detroit -> Cali

    Slyk God made a prophet.

    Mar 28, 2016
    A few days ago, it was widely reported that the FBI was consulting with an Israeli company called Cellebrite to try and hack the device.
     
    #13
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  14. Charlie Work
    Posts: 14,879
    Likes: 25,809
    Joined: Nov 28, 2014

    Charlie Work Level 5 Goblin

    Mar 28, 2016
    Hmmm, well I don't know. I read very little on the matter.
     
    #14
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024
  15. The Product
    Posts: 2,150
    Likes: 2,017
    Joined: Feb 15, 2011

    Apr 1, 2016
    I think we just have to accept that if the government wants out information, they will find a way to get it
     
    #15
    0 0
    Apr 25, 2024