Jul 27, 2016 You want corruption? How about literally asking Russia to commit espionage to win an election???? lmao
Jul 27, 2016 yeah if it means exposing more corruption then im fine with it, you're mad because it paints your candidate in a terrible light, more damage control from the hillbots
Jul 27, 2016 you're beyond arguments m8. trump could say anything and it would resonate with your myopic grasp of policy/politics/national security/basic decency. bet trump could suggest a purge and you'd be all for it. fool.
Jul 27, 2016 New rule: if you're supporting a candidate who asks for Russia to expose a secretary of state's emails so he can win an election, you're not allowed to call anyone else "robotic."
Jul 27, 2016 Or how about you can't claim to be holier-than-thou ("I'm against corruption," whatever that means) then literally be fine with whatever Trump suggests, regardless of how objectionable/scary it is. Like, @Lamont you realize you aren't principled, just a simple-minded, potentially sexist twit. You're like @TimmyT if he were mean spirited/politically minded.
Jul 27, 2016 Let me get this straight. You want a foreign nation to hack an ex-secretary of states emails which might contain sensitive national security information because it will make Clinton look bad? Weren't you the one that was all up in arms about Clinton's emails possibly getting hacked and now you're encouraging it? Like... Wtf....
Jul 27, 2016 I was fine with what Snowden did too, as he exposed some f----- up practices.. and many people labeled him a traitor. Regarding russia hacking hillary's emails, i truly hate corruption and hillary is the epitome of corruption in the flesh. if they have them they should just release everything.
Jul 27, 2016 Do you not see the hypocrisy in your stance though? You've criticized Clinton endlessly on this board for mishandling sensitive information and have posted links about how foreign nations have supposedly "hacked" her servers. You clearly took a stance that she should have been more careful with the information she received because other nations can take advantage and steal it. Now you're sitting here telling me that you're fine with a foreign nation hacking and taking potentially sensitive information. Like.... What?
Jul 27, 2016 Yeah if the foreign nation exposes her wrongdoing, then thats a good thing. We clearly disagree.
Jul 27, 2016 I like how you mention a bunch of people who argue with you, but don't support Trump.... Also, just because someone leaked something doesn't mean it is their fault for the public backlash. Also, blaming Trump is very typical of you.
Jul 27, 2016 bro, chill. i mentioned people who have recently been engaged -- including paul. you seriously need to see a psychiatrist and take lexipro. also: blaming trump? wtf he said in a pres conference russia should hack hillary. he's running for president. do you support this or not?
Jul 27, 2016 I find the entire thing hilarious...Trump has gotta be the greatest troll in the history of politics...he always says JUST enough to be like "wow, that is f----- up..." but never enough to the point he can't deny his intentions or claim it was taken out of context... I don't care if it's Russians or a super nerd from Nebraska, I think if there is anything incriminating in her emails then leak them...let the public see who she really is (even though most are already aware she's a corrupt b----)
Jul 27, 2016 I'm confused. I watched the speech earlier today and he said that if Russia has the emails they should release them. Aren't her emails on a private server? The only way this would be a threat to national security is if Hillary had classififed information on that server, which is illegal.
