Jul 23, 2016 Well we've known that for some time. But now we have heaps of concrete evidence that Hilary and the DNC are actually as bad as people were saying they are.
Jul 23, 2016 Of course the DNC worked against Bernie. He was trying to bring change to the country and to the system. Sadly, all the democrats seem to care about is holding onto power.
Jul 24, 2016 You mean..........a political party.........................................wants to win elections? crack analysis from the SXN80 Action News team
Jul 24, 2016 They take power over trying to help the people. Bernie Sanders was clearly the superior candidate, but the Democrats actively worked against him. That shows they don't trust their members or the democratic system.
Jul 24, 2016 The last time one of the parties won a third consecutive presidential race was in '88, and even then it was with a vice president running. When this process started eighteen months ago, Obama's approval ratings were not sterling the way they are now. These races are difficult to win. But before we get into the legality (what the DNC did is legal) or the logic (pushing the candidate with the best chance to win is literally the party leadership's job), can we talk about how asininely stupid your posts in this thread have been? You can't argue concurrently that: A. The DNC cares more about holding on to power than anything else; they suppressed Bernie Sanders B. Bernie Sanders was "clearly the superior candidate"; they suppressed Bernie Sanders I mean, which is it? Is the DNC a group of power-hungry monsters who will stop at nothing to get their candidates elected? (Again........they're a political party.) Or did they choose to go with an inferior candidate???? You're not making sense in the slightest. Also a huge cry-laughing emoji at "clearly the superior candidate." I'm sorry, but as much as your boys on the right keep the insanely hypocritical email story alive, Clinton is a much more viable candidate for the general than a 75-year-old socialist.
Jul 24, 2016 Wow you're dense. Bernie is the better candidate, because he has better ideas. Clinton has a hawkish foreign policy that is a total step backwards for America, however, it's easier to argue for. That's the point. The DNC sided with the candidate who had worse ideas about how to solve problems in America, because she would be easier to form a campaign around. You just said it. Sanders is a 75-year-old socialist. He's a harder sell to the general public. Again, it's just a power grab. It's not about which candidate has the interests of Americans in mind.
Jul 24, 2016 thanks for the compliment, personally don't think i'm that good a writer/debater though.
