Nov 25, 2015

Are you for or against it? Discuss.

 

Nov 25, 2015

I am for. There is no need to keep some psychos in prisons, when they can be still dangerous after they finally get out.

 

Nov 25, 2015

Not to mention how much it costs society to keep them in Prison.

 

Nov 25, 2015

Well.. at least have a beating day in prison, where we can come and land a punch where ever the f--- we want on them b------s

 

Nov 25, 2015

Doesn't having a prisoner on death row cost more than not?

It's a tough call because you do see stories of people who were found innocent after decades of being in prison, there is still too high a risk of ending the life of people who have been wrongly accused.

I think we should use these people instead of animals in testing products.

 

Nov 25, 2015

Death penalty is more expensive

 

Nov 25, 2015

Depends on your methods

 

Nov 25, 2015

LOL

 

Nov 25, 2015

I'm not sure, we can't decide who lives and who dies. Unfortunately, justice isn't perfect.
But i'm in favor of forced labor, so the government don't have to pay for their room.

 

Nov 25, 2015

I like this idea, for the MAJOR criminals though, of course.

 

Nov 25, 2015

Yeah, just for the MAJOR ones

 

Nov 26, 2015

Against it. It's not up to a judge/state to decide to terminate someone's life, no matter how atrocious many crimes might be. An eye for an eye isn't the answer.

 

Nov 26, 2015

That's the impression I was under but since then I've heard conflicting facts regarding that.

 

Nov 26, 2015

I'm against it

 

Nov 26, 2015

what was that quote... something like "Permanent solution to a temporary problem" ?
like what benefit does anyone get out of someone dying? It apparently costs more, so you aren't exactly saving money by killing them. Then you think about the people who do get wrongly convicted, even though its a small amount, it still happens. I mean, why death? like why not be creative?

Companies should be able to call up prisons where death-row inmates are renamed something. (for this example, we'll just say c----). So someone like NASA can call up and say "gday m8's you got any c---- we can use? Got this new fucken space gear that might let you breathe in space, we needa test it though so swing a c---- our way so we can send him to space with this gear"

it just seems like a waste to just k--- them and watch them die and be like "ok his dead" when you could literally just use them for testing things that are risky/dangerous but could potentially further the human race.

-on that note, would also be great to give theses "c----" actual life threatening viruses/illnesses/diseases to see if any of that voodoo naturopath alternative medicine works

 

Nov 26, 2015

Death penalty is a shame and discredit all what a democracy is.

 

Nov 26, 2015

It will never happen because it's against human rights. We really don't want to follow a path of hitler or other c---- who tested medicines on their citizens. We can't give them so much physical pain. Even with death penalties you inject the prisoners a poison to let them die without suffering.

 

Nov 27, 2015

Nah, the death penalty is 100% more expensive than life in prison due to all the appeals and long judicial processes. I'd be for the death penalty if we had a more efficient method of conducting it. At the same time though, there have been numerous studies that show that the death penalty doesn't curve or reduce crime in anyway. It's simply a consequence that makes us feel justified by removing somebody bad/evil from the world.

U.S.'s justice system is all f----- though, we need complete reform. Maybe if we stopped imprisoning people for possession of small amounts of drugs and focused on imprisoning actually violent/dangerous criminals, we would have a better understanding how punishment should be handled.